Skip to content
Is the market open today? Today
SearchCtrl K
EnglishHinglish
My learning
Is the market open today? Today

Find your next idea

Unit study guide · NISM Series V-A

Legal and Regulatory Environment

19 questions in this unit

What this unit covers

Key ideas

From the practice bank · 1

An adult individual has passed NISM Series V-A and wants to work as a mutual fund distributor. Which registration is required for that distributor role?

To work as a mutual fund distributor, the person must register with AMFI and get an ARN, the AMFI Registration Number. AMFI's January 2026 master circular asks for the NISM certificate and this registration. Other rules still apply before selling, such as empanelment with each AMC. Remember: Do not treat the examination certificate and the distributor’s ARN as the same credential.

Hint Common mistake: Assuming that passing NISM alone completes every requirement to distribute mutual funds.

VA-020

From the practice bank · 2

An empanelled mutual fund distributor brings an ordinary regular-plan investment that falls outside any special upfronting or onboarding incentive provision. Which payment is consistent with the normal full-trail model?

This is the normal remuneration form described by the full-trail model. The question expressly excludes special provisions. The investment is outside any expressly permitted special arrangement, so apply the normal distribution rule. SEBI’s inspected master circular requires the full-trail model and restricts upfront payments or indirect rewards in cash or kind. A recurring trail commission fits that model. An upfront cash bonus, holiday or associate-routed incentive does not become permissible merely by changing its description. The master circular separately retains a narrow SIP upfronting provision. This question does not deny that provision or extend it to an ordinary investment. Remember: For ordinary distribution remuneration, identify genuine trail commission rather than a renamed upfront reward.

Hint Common mistake: Assuming that a non-cash or indirectly routed benefit is outside commission rules.

VA-021

From the practice bank · 3

A non-individual distributor proposes a separately identifiable, SEBI-registered investment-advisory division. It plans to charge one client an advisory fee while a group company receives distribution commission from the same client. Under SEBI’s published segregation guidance, which change is required?

The guidance requires client-level segregation at group level. A paid advisory client cannot simultaneously generate distributor consideration within the group. The proposal addresses registration and a separately identifiable division. Those steps do not by themselves settle the conflict created by receiving both types of consideration. SEBI’s published guidance says a non-individual adviser must maintain client-level segregation at group level. For the client in the question, the group must choose a paid advisory relationship without distributor consideration, or a distribution relationship without an advisory fee. Disclosure and separate group companies do not replace that distinction. The latest consolidated requirements must still be checked before implementing the business arrangement. Remember: For a non-individual adviser, test the client relationship across the group rather than looking only at one invoice.

Hint Common mistake: Assuming that registration, disclosure or a separate group company automatically permits both fee and distribution commission from the same client.

VA-022

From the practice bank · 4

Under SEBI's trail commission rules, which SIP qualifies for upfronting of trail commission?

This SIP meets all three tests: the investor is new to mutual funds by PAN, it is the first SIP, and the amount is small. SEBI allows trail to be upfronted on such a first SIP of up to ₹3,000 a month per scheme. The upfront trail is up to 1% a year for at most three years and comes from the AMC's own books. Remember: Apply the new-to-industry, monthly ceiling and first-SIP timing tests together.

Hint Common mistake: Confusing new-to-AMC with new-to-industry, or treating every SIP of a newly enrolled investor as eligible.

VA-045

From the practice bank · 5

An AMC pays ordinary recurring distributor commission relating to a regular-plan scheme. No special upfronting or onboarding provision applies. Under the general scheme-expense rule, where must this expense be borne?

Section 11.3.3 requires scheme-related distributor commission to be paid from the scheme within the regulatory limits, subject to specific provisions outside this question. The payment is an ordinary recurring commission relating to a scheme. The question excludes the specifically regulated special arrangements. Section 11.3.3 states that scheme-related expenses, including distributor commission, must be paid from the scheme within regulatory limits. The rule addresses the AMC, associates, sponsor, trustee and other routes. A different payer is not a general exemption. This does not mean every special incentive or initially funded SIP upfronting arrangement uses identical accounting. Their own express conditions must be read separately. Remember: For ordinary scheme commission, check both the permitted source of funding and the expense limits.

Hint Common mistake: Assuming that an AMC-funded or sponsor-funded payment is automatically outside the scheme’s expense restrictions.

VA-046

From the practice bank · 6

A distributor compares three competing mutual fund schemes for a client and recommends one. Which commission-disclosure approach gives the required comparison rather than hiding an incentive conflict?

The client needs to see how the distributor’s incentives differ across the alternatives from which the recommendation is made. The distributor is choosing among competing schemes, so the comparison includes the financial incentives attached to those alternatives. SEBI’s investor FAQ describes disclosure of commissions payable for competing schemes from which the recommendation is made. AMFI’s code also requires attention to conflicts and investor interests. A TER figure, total annual income or disclosure only for the selected scheme does not provide that same incentive comparison. The scheme still has to be suitable for the investor. Remember: Disclose the relevant competing incentives, not just a number associated with the selected product.

Hint Common mistake: Assuming that disclosing TER or the selected scheme’s commission is enough to explain incentives across the alternatives.

VA-047

From the practice bank · 7

A distributor onboards P, a new-to-industry male individual from a T-30 city, and Q, a new-to-industry woman from a B-30 city. Both invest in eligible schemes and meet all other conditions. Under SEBI’s March 2026 mutual fund master circular, which additional onboarding-incentive claim is consistent with these facts?

Q fits the new-woman and B-30 descriptions, but the same investor or investment cannot produce dual incentives. P does not fit either specified entry category. The relevant categories in the inspected provision include new-to-industry individuals from B-30 cities and new women investors from T-30 or B-30 cities. P is a new male individual from T-30, so neither stated category is met. Q is a new woman from B-30 and meets the stated categories. The other conditions are expressly assumed to be satisfied. The provision prohibits dual incentives for the same investor or investment. Therefore Q can support one qualifying claim, not separate B-30 and woman-investor claims. Remember: Check both eligibility and the prohibition on double-counting the same investor or investment.

Hint Common mistake: Assuming every new PAN qualifies, or claiming twice when one investor meets two eligibility descriptions.

VA-048

From the practice bank · 8

A distributor repeatedly moves a client between similar schemes mainly to earn more commission. The client’s goals and risk profile are unchanged, and no investment-related reason for the switches is documented. This practice is best described as:

The repeated transactions are driven by the distributor’s commission rather than a demonstrated investor need. Check whether the trades follow an investor objective, an allocation need or another documented investment reason. None is given here. The stated main motive is higher distributor commission through repeated moves between similar schemes. AMFI’s distributor code prohibits over-transacting or churning for higher commissions. Genuine changes can be justified, but that is not the scenario described. Remember: Judge switching by the investor need and documented reason, not by the mere existence of a new scheme.

Hint Common mistake: Calling commission-driven turnover “rebalancing” without identifying a portfolio need.

VA-049

From the practice bank · 9

Under SEBI’s March 2026 mutual fund master circular, a scheme proposes a change in fundamental attributes covered by the normal unitholder exit requirement. Which exit arrangement is specified?

This matches the calendar-day period, the prevailing-NAV basis and the exit-load waiver. Use the dated provision, not a generic redemption assumption. The SID-format requirement specifies a period of at least 30 calendar days. During that opportunity, the exit is at the prevailing NAV and without an exit load. The exit opportunity does not itself erase a market loss or imply a tax exemption. The question does not ask for the full procedure for changing the scheme. Remember: For this provision, remember the period, valuation basis and exit-load treatment separately.

Hint Common mistake: Treating an exit-load waiver as either a repayment guarantee or a tax waiver.

VA-088

From the practice bank · 10

A distributor says a scheme is suitable for every investor because its SID has been filed with SEBI. Which response best addresses that claim?

The prescribed caveat distinguishes the regulatory document process from approval or recommendation of the investment. The claim moves from a regulatory process to a conclusion about every investor. That conclusion does not follow. The prescribed SID wording distinguishes filing from approval or recommendation by SEBI. An investor must still consider the scheme’s characteristics and the investor’s own needs. Neither expected performance nor individual suitability is established by filing alone. Remember: Regulation is not a recommendation to buy a particular scheme.

Hint Common mistake: Using “filed with SEBI” as a shortcut for “appropriate for everyone”.

VA-089

From the practice bank · 11

An individual distributor has a valid ARN and the required certification but is not empanelled with a particular AMC. Under AMFI’s January 2026 distributor master circular, what additional step is required before procuring business for that AMC?

The distributor must first complete that AMC's formal empanelment process. AMFI's circular says an ARN does not automatically empanel a distributor with any AMC. The ARN and the certificate are already in place, so they are not the missing step. Remember: Do not confuse having an ARN with being empanelled by every AMC.

Hint Common mistake: Assuming an industry registration automatically authorises distribution for every fund house.

VA-098

From the practice bank · 12

For this calculation only, trail commission is 0.60% a year on the stated eligible asset base using actual days divided by 365. The base is ₹20 lakh for 10 days, ₹18 lakh for 10 days and ₹25 lakh for 11 days. What is the 31-day commission, ignoring taxes and other adjustments?

The day-weighted asset base, 0.006 annual rate and 365-day divisor give ₹1,076.71. The annual rate as a decimal is 0.60 ÷ 100 = 0.006. The three periods total 10 + 10 + 11 = 31 days. Asset-days = ₹20,00,000 × 10 + ₹18,00,000 × 10 + ₹25,00,000 × 11 = 6,55,00,000 rupee-days. Commission = 6,55,00,000 × 0.006 ÷ 365 = ₹1,076.712328… Rounded to the nearest paise, the commission is ₹1,076.71. The stated day basis is 365, not 360. Remember: Use the stated eligible base, period weights and annual day-count denominator together.

Hint Common mistake: Applying the closing balance to the whole month or silently changing the day-count convention.

VA-100

From the practice bank · 13

Under SEBI’s March 2026 mutual fund master circular, an employee of a corporate distributor interacts with an investor during a sale. Apart from the distributor’s ARN, which identifier is intended to identify that employee in the application?

EUIN identifies the relevant employee or salesperson separately from the distributor’s ARN. The ARN identifies the distributor. A corporate distributor can have multiple employees involved in selling its products. The cited section provides for a unique identifier for the employee, relationship manager or salesperson and an application field alongside ARN. The employee’s EUIN identifies that person. It does not replace the distributor’s ARN or the investor’s account identifier. Remember: Use ARN to identify the distributor and EUIN to identify the relevant employee involved in the sale.

Hint Common mistake: Assuming the organisation’s ARN identifies every individual who dealt with the investor.

VA-118

From the practice bank · 14

An investor submits a valid instruction to change the mutual fund distributor. The AMC insists on a no-objection certificate from the existing distributor solely because the distributor is changing. Under SEBI’s March 2026 mutual fund master circular, is that insistence correct?

This matches the cited rule and addresses the only missing document described in the stem. The question states that the instruction is otherwise valid. The only reason given for rejecting it is the missing old-distributor NOC. the circular requires the AMC to act on the investor’s wish without compelling that NOC. This removes the stated NOC condition. It does not remove other genuine identity, signature or instruction-validity checks. Remember: A valid distributor-change instruction should not be blocked solely for want of the old distributor’s NOC.

Hint Common mistake: Confusing checks on the investor’s valid instruction with permission from the outgoing distributor.

VA-119

From the practice bank · 15

An equity scheme has existed for eight months at the relevant preceding month-end. Under SEBI’s March 2026 mutual fund master circular, which performance basis applies to its advertisement?

This is the method and pair of periods specified for a scheme in the stated age band. Eight months places the scheme above six months and below one year. For that age band, the cited provision uses simple annualised growth for the past six months and since inception, using the prescribed preceding month-end. This differs from and from a blanket prohibition until the first anniversary. The figure is a historical presentation method, not a forecast of a full year’s return. Remember: Check the scheme-age band and the required return convention before selecting an advertising figure.

Hint Common mistake: Applying a remembered one-year restriction without checking the particular provision and return convention.

VA-120

From the practice bank · 16

A distributor offers an investor a cash payment equal to one-quarter of the commission earned on a new investment, solely to attract that investment. Under the Code of Conduct in AMFI’s January 2026 master circular, how is this offer treated?

The offer is the commission pass-back described by the prohibition. The proposed payment is tied to the commission and is offered to attract the investment. The named code prohibits rebating or passing back commission. The account used, a disclosure and a consent form do not change the nature of that offer. Remember: Check whether a practice is prohibited before assuming disclosure can cure it.

Hint Common mistake: Confusing transparent conduct with conduct that is permitted in the first place.

VA-145

From the practice bank · 17

A mutual fund distributor’s group company asks for identifiable client holdings and contact details to sell an unrelated product. There is no legal disclosure requirement. Under the Code of Conduct in AMFI’s January 2026 master circular, which response applies to the proposed cross-marketing use?

This answer follows the specific group-company cross-marketing restriction. The purpose is cross-marketing by a group company, not a legally required disclosure. The named code expressly addresses that use. A confidentiality promise or a re-identifiable client number does not change the cross-marketing purpose. Remember: Consider the purpose of sharing, not just the recipient’s relationship with the distributor.

Hint Common mistake: Treating every transfer inside a corporate group as an internal use of investor data.

VA-146

From the practice bank · 18

A principal distributor’s ARN is valid, but a sub-distributor’s ARN has become invalid. Under the Code of Conduct in AMFI’s January 2026 master circular, may the principal continue to engage that sub-distributor to procure fresh mutual fund business while the ARN remains invalid?

The prohibition applies while the sub-distributor’s ARN remains invalid. The question states that the sub-distributor’s ARN is already invalid, not merely approaching expiry. The named code requires sub-distributors to have valid ARNs and says the principal should not engage or continue to engage one whose ARN is invalid. This question is about continued engagement for new business. It does not determine treatment of past commission or the processing of an application already submitted. Remember: Check registration validity at each relevant distributor level.

Hint Common mistake: Assuming that a principal’s valid registration automatically covers an unregistered or invalidly registered intermediary.

VA-147

From the practice bank · 19

An investor selects a regular-plan transaction independently and has no interaction with the distributor’s employee or salesperson about it. The EUIN box is intentionally left blank. Under AMFI’s January 2026 distributor master circular, what is needed for the stated no-interaction exception?

The investor must sign a separate declaration in the prescribed form. AMFI's circular asks for it when the investor chose the scheme with no help from the distributor's staff. Calling a sale execution-only is not that declaration. In other cases the EUIN must be given. Remember: Apply the conditions and documentation of an exception, not just its label.

Hint Common mistake: Assuming “execution-only” automatically means no employee identification or declaration is needed.

VA-148
CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate)Read more